06/30/12: The Washington Post reports the Obama Administration imposed sanctions on a pair of informal money-exchange networks in Afghanistan and Pakistan on Friday in what officials described as the first use of the tactic to attack the financial underpinnings of Taliban militants who rely on the system to fund their insurgency. The sanctions announced by the Treasury Department were coordinated with similar measures adopted by the United Nations as part of a broad effort to slow the flow of cash used by the Taliban to pay salaries and purchase weapons for attacks in Afghanistan. These informal cash networks, commonly known as hawalas, have long been used by Taliban commanders and other militants to move funds back and forth across the Afghan-Pakistani border.

Get the Brief via Twitter
Get the Brief via Email
Commentary: The new national security canon
06/28/12: Lawfare features a post by Steve Vladeck discussing how much difficulty plaintiffs have had in suing the US government over post-September 11 governmental abuses. Vladeck argues the courts have created a “national security canon,” a body of rules unique to national security cases that, at least thus far, all cut against allowing relief in suits that might otherwise be able to proceed to judgment. The essay suggests that as the national security canon becomes more deeply ingrained, the likelihood increases that it will expand into contexts other than those in which it has thus far been recognized.
June 28, 2012 at 08:53 AM in Judiciary / Cases, Executive Branch, Intelligence, Military, Terrorism / Counterterrorism, Constitutional Law, Detainees / Guantanamo, Secrecy / Transparency / FOIA, State Secrets Privilege / CIPA, Commentary / Opinion | Permalink